Home Forums Making the Decision Does style depends on grower/shower?

This topic contains 6 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  jack 4 months, 2 weeks ago.

  • Author
  • #5900 Reply


    Hi guys,

    I’m thinking about getting a circumcision with a high and tight style. But does this depends on whether you’re a grower or a shower? I guess it would be easier to get a high/tight one if you’re a shower then if you’re a grower but maybe I’m wrong.
    Any adults here who are a grower and had a high/tight style circumcision?

  • #6986 Reply


    My cock is 5″ flaccid and just shy of 8″ hard. I have a very tight circumcision and it’s medium high with the scar at 1.5″ from the ridge of the head. My original cut was higher with the scar about 2″ from the ridge of the head but as an adult I got re-circumcised to make it really tight. I don’t know if my cock would be considered a grower or a shower but if it is considered a grower, I can tell you I don’t have any problem with high and tight.

    When I’m soft my cockhead is always totally exposed and when hard there is no skin movement at all. It feels great to me. High and tight is what I recommend. And don’t forget to have your frenulum removed at the same time. You don’t need it and your dick will look ugly if you keep it. I got rid of mine when I was re-circumcised and have never regretted it.

    Good luck on you circumcision!

  • #7155 Reply


    I would have to agree with Mike, and also on the point of the frenulum being cut, it makes a big difference to style and look

  • #7184 Reply


    I have to agree with those above. My cut was high and tight and the frenulum was removed at well. The skin is tight and feels really good. My wife likes the look of my organ (we both use the term dong) either flaccid (when about three to four inches) or hard when it is about seven and half inches. She also likes it that she can feel me when I come inside her. that’s always a thrill for her. Good luck with what you decide.

  • #7530 Reply


    Tightness is dependent on how much you grow. I said at a consultation before the operation that I wanted the head completely bare even when sat down in the cold. I was told that some skin had to remain so there was room to grow either way, but I was relatively lucky as I am a ‘shower’ and had a relatively short foreskin. Growers might have difficulty getting their head uncovered all the time, so they might not get the full hygiene/comfort benefits and the everyday sensations from having the corona naked but unless he is very unlucky he can probably get the shaft skin smooth and no coverage on erection, so sexually there won’t be much difference.

  • #7558 Reply


    I would go along with this. Mine is about 3″ soft, and grows to almost 7″. I told my surgeon I wanted a totally bare glans (high-and-tight), but he said that he advised a medium tight cut to ‘allow for growth’. It certainly does that – there is a certain amount of give on the underside of the shaft when hard. But when soft, the remains of the skin do roll over the glans, and if it’s very cold, then the glans retreats inside! It’s also not helped by the fact that, unlike most circumcised men I know, my glans does not retain the full size when soft, but shrinks. So it does not hold the skin back. Nor has the remaining skin shrivelled up as may I have seen do.

  • #7951 Reply


    From my own experience, I would say yes, style CAN matter if you’re a grower (can, not must).
    I had to be circumcised as a medical emergency at age 23. I was left with a high loose cut. The surgeon did what was necessary to help me with my problem (I’d zipped my foreskin up in my jeans without any underwear) but didn’t really pay any attention to aesthetics. I’m about 3-4 inches flaccid and around 7 – 8 when erect. What happened in my case was that, because the cut was loose and penis isn’t large at rest, the loose skin trapped a lot of the interstitial fluid in the inner mucosa immediately behind my corona. It would go away on erection, but at rest it was always there. My surgeon advised me to just wear the skin rolled forward as it was before, which was a strange thing to say I thought, considering he’d just removed some of it.

    Anyway, as the years passed it never really resolved as we hoped it would and I went in search of a revision. I saw 2 different urologists and both told me it’s an issue they see quite often in adult circs (never in infant ones surprisingly) and the guy I eventually chose said the best solution was to remove the inner skin that was trapping the fluid. I was a bit hesitant because by this stage I’d read all about inner skin and sensitivity, and i have to say, my penis felt amazing even though it didn’t look so pretty anymore, so I wasn’t all that keen to lose these new sensations, but we compromised and he left me with a centimeter of inner skin and a low, fairly loose cut. No problems ever since, but from what I experienced and what I was told, these issues are not uncommon in growers. Showers don’t have this problem.

Reply To: Does style depends on grower/shower?
Your information:

− 5 = 5